Not a fact anymore

Light travels faster in optically denser transparent media such as water than in air.

What we know now

Light travels more slowly through ordinary transparent materials such as water and glass than through vacuum or air. Their refractive index is related to that reduced propagation speed.

Why it changed

Newtonian corpuscular optics and wave optics made opposite predictions about light's speed in water. In 1850, Léon Foucault directly compared propagation in air and water and found light slower in water, strongly favoring the wave prediction over the Newtonian corpuscular one.

Status
Overturned
Category
Physics
Accepted for
≈146 years
Accepted approximately
A prediction of dominant Newtonian corpuscular optics in the 18th and early 19th centuries
Changed approximately
1850

For a time, measuring light’s speed in water was a way to choose between two competing pictures of what light is.

In Newtonian corpuscular optics, light consisted of tiny particles. To bend a ray toward the normal when it entered water or glass, the denser medium was supposed to exert an attractive force that increased the corpuscles’ speed. Wave theories predicted the opposite: refraction into a denser medium required a lower propagation speed.

Newtonian optics dominated much eighteenth-century British and European optics, so the faster-in-water prediction acquired substantial authority even though wave theories never disappeared.

The experimental test was extraordinarily difficult because light moves so quickly. In 1850, Léon Foucault adapted a rotating-mirror method to compare the speed of light through air and water over laboratory distances. The result was decisive in sign: light traveled slower in water.

That did not by itself establish the full modern electromagnetic theory of light, but it removed one of the most important experimental advantages of Newton’s corpuscular refraction mechanism.

Modern optics describes a material by its refractive index; in ordinary media the phase velocity of light is lower than in vacuum.

Evidence

Sources and what they establish

Historical context

Previous belief

  • Newton's OpticsOxford Handbook of the History of Physics

    Reviews the long dominance of Newtonian corpuscular optics and its explanation of refraction.

Current evidence

  • The Speed of LightNIST

    Provides the exact vacuum speed of light, the reference point for modern refractive-index descriptions.

Related entries

Or go somewhere else: